Q

Anonymous asked:

How come some things in a game (typically RPG's) just...suck? Like of course everything can't be powerful and some things will be weaker. I mean things that should be reasonably powerful in at least one way but are actually wholly unusable in even the best environments. Like the Bearcat in Borderlands 2. A unique weapon with an extremely high rarity and it's among the worst weapons in the *series*. I see things like this often. I feel like these instances can't be something that just slips by developers.

A

image

Sometimes it is unintentional. Maybe we as designers overvalued a particular stat during design, like early stamina on wow gear, making that gear less desirable. Sometimes there’s a bug in the item itself that makes it not work as intended, like the Pendant in Faxanadu which has an accidental negative multiplier on the stat boost, making it reduce attack power instead of increase it.

image

Most times it is intentional. Item quality can’t exist in a vacuum. An item can only be good or bad relative to the other items it is compared to. Evaluating items is a skill that we game designers must cultivate in players so they can distinguish good items from bad. That can only exist when there are good and bad items to distinguish from each other. Some things are genuinely intended to be weaker than others in order to provide contrast - this sword is really good, because the other options in its level class are bad in comparison to it. This spell is good because it provides the best overall damage per magic point spent to cast it.

image

This means that players who know how to evaluate items get an additional feeling of appreciation when they find a new item and realize it is a good one. Finding a good item feels better than finding an ordinary item. This is another element of cultivating player skill through intentional design.

[Join us on Discord] and/or [Support us on Patreon]

Got a burning question you want answered?